Special Thanks to Our Contributors
The CaYPT Committee
All contributor informations are identical to the form submissions. We respect the contributors’ description of their name and their location.
Ali Omar from Macao
Pedro Tavares from Brazil / São Paulo
Sam Edgecombe from Sweden
Xiongxiong Pei from Canada
Current Number of References
- Problem 1: Invent Yourself
- Problem 2: Rayleigh Disk
- Problem 3: Ring on the Rod
- Problem 4: Unsinkable Disk
- Problem 5: Bimetallic Oscillator
- Problem 6: Tennis Ball Tower
- Problem 7: Three-Sided Dice
- Problem 8: Equipotential Lines
- Problem 9: Water Spiral
- Problem 10: Droplet Explosion
- Problem 11: Balls on an Elastic Band
- Problem 12: Strange Motion
- Problem 13: Candle Powered Turbine
- Problem 14: Ball on Membrane
- Problem 15: Boycott Effect
- Problem 16: Saving Honey
- Problem 17: Invisibility
GO TO :
How we classify references
We classify all references into one of three categories. Category one is phenomenon demonstration, category two is books, encyclopedia, discussion and forum posts and category three is published research papers. The three categories offer different perspectives into the problem and have different levels of academic rigour.
These are commonly videos on platforms like YouTube, Facebook etc. The videos show the phenomenon described in the problem statement or one that is similar. Whether the videos accurately depict the problem statement is up to individual interpretations. These references are often created to demonstrate a physical principle qualitatively. Many lack control of key parameters and thus not suitable for scientific analysis.
Books, Encyclopedia, Discussion and Forum Posts
This category contains references from many sources. The accuracy of information in this category can vary. Textbooks and lecture slides/notes are the most accurate. Other professional books and student thesis are generally accurate. Encyclopedia and forum post answers are only sometimes accurate because the primary source of information is often missing. . Student discussion is not a reliable source of information.
This category only contains articles written to academic standards. Most of the articles in this section are published in peer-reviewed journals. A very small proportion of articles are from arXiv. Note that the articles on arXiv is only a preprint and might not be peer-reviewed. But since these articles are written with academic rigour in mind, the information accuracy is still generally better than encyclopedia and forum posts.